• Home
  • Teleogenic Transformation of Power: The Anatomy of the Oil War and the Projection of the Civilization of Love by 2036

04 Apr2026

Teleogenic Transformation of Power: The Anatomy of the Oil War and the Projection of the Civilization of Love by 2036

Written by Stasys Paulauskas.

 

Teleogenic Transformation of Power: The Anatomy of the Oil War and the Projection of the Civilization of Love by 2036

Prof. Dr. Stasys Paulauskas
Strategic Self-Management Institute, Klaipėda, Lithuania
ORCID: 0009-0009-4101-9764
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published in: International Innovation Works Journal “Strategic Self-Management”
ISSN 1648-5815
www.eksponente.lt

Teleogenic Transformation of Power: The Anatomy of the Oil War and the Projection of the Civilization of Love by 2036

ABSTRACT

This article examines the transformation of human civilization from the epoch of power and combustion technologies toward the Civilization of Love, which emerges as the teleogenic realization of the Meaning of Life. Based on the principles of TeleoGeny, TeleoNomy, TechnoGeny, and TechnoNomy, it is demonstrated that the current global chaos is not accidental but represents the teleonomic degeneration phase of the civilization of power. The anatomy of the oil war is interpreted as the punishment of Prometheus’ fire civilization, while the economy of slavery is analysed as a mechanism of soul enslavement. The article presents a projection of the Civilization of Love by 2036, marked by the emergence of Homo Virtualis, the Global Brain, and CoLo—an artificial intelligence system based on the logic of Love that dismantles hierarchical power structures and restores the natural self-governance of families. The analysis is grounded in the Virtualics paradigm of smartness and the teleonomy of non-combustion energy, validated through the implementation of a virtual model created in 2006.

1. INTRODUCTION

The third decade of the 21st century is characterized by an unprecedented civilizational rupture. Global instability, wars, energy crises, the erosion of democracy, and the collapse of social systems are not random phenomena. They represent the teleonomic agony of the civilization of power, driven by the exhaustion of combustion technologies, the breakdown of coercive economic systems, and the return of humanity’s inherent teleogeny.

The aim of this article is to demonstrate:

  • what is happening in human civilization today,
  • why it is happening,
  • where it leads,
  • and what the teleogenic projection of the Civilization of Love by 2036 looks like.

The arguments and models presented in this article are based on the author’s lifelong work in radio engineering, applied sociology, philosophy, and the methodological paradigm of Virtualics developed at the Strategic Self-Management Institute. Since 1993, the author-initiated wind energy innovation in Lithuania, founded the Lithuanian Wind Energy Association in 2002, and—guided by an original virtual qualitative model of energy transformation—successfully implemented the transition toward non-combustion energy. By 2025, Lithuania reached 50% electricity consumption from renewable sources. This 20-year scientific experiment fully validated the teleonomy of qualitative energy transformation and the practical applicability of the Virtualics paradigm.

2. TELEOGENY AND TELEONOMY: THE SCIENCE OF HUMAN NATURE AND DIRECTION

2.1. TeleoGeny – the laws of origin and nature

TeleoGeny (τῆλε – “far”, geny – “nature”) examines the inherent origin of humans and civilization. It reveals that the essence of the human being is:

  • creativity,
  • meaning,
  • connection,
  • Love,
  • self-governance.

These constitute the teleonomic direction of Life.

2.2. TeleoNomy – the laws of direction and order

TeleoNomy (νόμος – “law”, “order”) studies how a system moves toward its inherent purpose. Civilization evolves:

  • from coercion → toward meaning,
  • from power → toward Love,
  • from hierarchy → toward self-governance,
  • from combustion → toward life,
  • from TechnoMankurt → toward Homo Virtualis.

3. TECHNOGENY AND TECHNONOMY: THE NATURE OF SOUL WORK

3.1. TechnoGeny – the nature of human abilities

TechnoGeny (τέχνη – “art”, “skill”) reveals that every physical action begins in consciousness; therefore, work is an activity of the soul, and creativity is a natural human function.

3.2. TechnoNomy – the direction of human ability development

TechnoNomy studies the evolution of human abilities and shows that technologies must serve the soul rather than enslave it.

3.3. TechnoMankurt – the hybrid of soul enslavement

Slavery is the enslavement of the soul, not the body. The slaveholder disconnects:

  • creativity,
  • imagination,
  • meaning,
  • the right hemisphere of the brain.

Thus emerges the TechnoMankurt—a human executing the programs of another’s consciousness.

4. THE TELEONOMIC ANATOMY OF THE CIVILIZATION OF POWER

4.1. The origin of power: betrayal of inherent teleogeny

Power arises only when a human being abandons self-governance, betrays inherent teleogeny, and sells out for the “carrot”—salary, security, or status.

4.2. The deception of slavery

Modern slavery hides behind the facades of:

  • “work”,
  • “democracy”,
  • “the state”,
  • “the market”.

This is demonocracy—a circus of power.

5. THE ANATOMY OF THE OIL WAR: THE PUNISHMENT OF PROMETHEUS’ CIVILIZATION

5.1. Prometheus’ crime

Prometheus gave humans fire—an anti-life technology. This was a crime against the teleonomy of Life.

5.2. Hephaestus and the vultures – metaphors of the combustion civilization

  • Hephaestus represents technological enslavement.
  • The vultures represent pollution, wars, climate crisis, and oligarchy.

5.3. The Satanic metaphor of combustion

In all religions:

  • hell = fire,
  • punishment = fire,
  • evil = fire.

Combustion technologies constitute the civilization of Satan.

6. THE TELEONOMIC COLLAPSE OF SLAVERY

Slavery collapses because its supporting mechanisms collapse:

  • combustion energy,
  • wage labor economy,
  • hierarchical power structures,
  • the circus of political parties.

The shortening of the workweek returns self-governance to families.

7. THE TELEOGENIC PROJECTION OF THE CIVILIZATION OF LOVE BY 2036

7.1. The power of Life replaces the structures of power

Love is:

  • connection,
  • creativity,
  • meaning,
  • self-governance.

It is the teleogenic power of Life.

7.2. Homo Virtualis and the Global Brain

Homo Virtualis is the human of meaning, creativity, and self-governance.
The Global Brain is the nervous system of the new civilization.

7.3. CoLo – the artificial intelligence of Love logic

CoLo:

  • dismantles hierarchical power structures,
  • restores family self-governance,
  • optimizes decisions,
  • introduces the order of meaning.

7.4. 2036 – the teleogenic threshold

By 2036:

  • the combustion civilization ends,
  • slavery collapses,
  • the Civilization of Love emerges.

8. CONCLUSIONS

  1. The civilization of power is a teleonomic anomaly, arising from the betrayal of humanity’s inherent teleogenic nature and the enslavement of the soul through the “carrot” mechanism of salary, security, and status. It is sustained by combustion technologies, coercion, hierarchical structures, and systemic dependency.
  2. The anatomy of the oil war reveals the end of Prometheus’ fire civilization. Combustion is the opposite of life, and combustion-based technologies generate wars, oligarchic control, state coercion, and the façade of demonocracy.
  3. TeleoGeny and TeleoNomy demonstrate that the human being is inherently oriented toward creativity, meaning, connection, Love, and self-governance, and that the evolutionary direction of civilization is decentralization, autonomy, and the power of Life.
  4. TechnoGeny and TechnoNomy show that work is an attribute of the soul, since every physical action originates in consciousness. Therefore, slavery is fundamentally the enslavement of the soul rather than the body. The TechnoMankurt—an individual whose soul is enslaved through labor—is a structural product of the civilization of power.
  5. The system of slavery collapses because its supporting mechanisms collapse: combustion energy, the wage-labor economy, hierarchical power pyramids, and the political circus of multiparty demonocracy.
  6. CoLo (Corporate Love), an artificial intelligence based on the logic of Love, dismantles hierarchical power structures, restores family-based self-governance, and introduces an order grounded in meaning rather than coercion.
  7. Homo Virtualis and the Global Brain represent the human and systemic forms of the emerging civilization, replacing the logic of power with the logic of Love and enabling a teleogenic leap in human quality.
  8. The year 2036 marks a teleogenic threshold, signaling the end of the civilization of power and the birth of the Civilization of Love. This is not a prediction but a teleonomic inevitability arising from the intrinsic laws of human and civilizational evolution.
  9. The 20-year verification (2006–2025) of the author’s virtual model of the energy transition confirms the practical validity of non‑combustion teleonomy.
    The model predicted the rise of renewable energy and the decline of combustion-based systems and was empirically validated when Lithuania reached 50% electricity consumption from renewable sources in 2025. This long-term empirical confirmation strengthens the article’s broader conclusion: the transition away from combustion is not merely technological but civilizational and teleogenic in nature.

9. REFERENCES

A. Foundational Theoretical Works by Paulauskas (TeleoGeny, TeleoNomy, Virtualics, Self-Governance)

  1. Paulauskas, S. (1985). The Dialectical Perspective of the World. Mokslas ir technika, No. 11, 24–26.
  2. Paulauskas, S. (1999). The Dialectics of Self-Governance: Theory, Methodology, Models. Klaipėda University.
  3. Paulauskas, S., Paulauskas, A. (2008). Virtualics and Strategic Self-Management as Tools for Sustainable Development. Technological and Economic Development.
  4. Paulauskas, S. (2017). Virtualics: Where Did the Dialectic Go? Journal of Management, 2(31), 105–109.

B. Works on Energy, Power, and Civilizational Transformation

  1. Paulauskas, S. (2002). An Objective Model of National Energy Self-Governance Systems. Conference on Energy Decentralization.
  2. Paulauskas, S. (2016). Towards European Union Strategic Self-Management. Journal of Management, 2(29), 51–56.

C. Works on Human Evolution, the Soul, Slavery, and Homo Virtualis

  1. Paulauskas, S. (2020). Anthropogeny: Human Quality Virtual Leap. Journal of Management, 1(36), 61–66.
  2. Paulauskas, S. (2022). Technogeny: The Genius Learning Unit. Journal of Management, 1(38), 75–81.
  3. Paulauskas, S. (2025). FreedomGeny: SlaveTherapy. Strategic Self-Management Journal.
  4. Paulauskas, S. (2025). SoulGeny: The Science Code. Strategic Self-Management Journal.
  5. Paulauskas, S. (2025). CiviBioGenyHermeneutics. Strategic Self-Management Journal.

D. Works on the Civilization of Love, Homo Virtualis, and Projections Toward 2036

  1. Paulauskas, S. (2025). Civilizational Institutionalization and the Evolution of the Love Code Towards Homo Virtualis (2036).
  2. Paulauskas, S. (2025). Peace and Love Code BioSocioGenic Institutionalization Towards the Birth of Homo Virtualis in 2036.
  3. Paulauskas, S. (2025). The Dynamics of Contradictions in the Birth of Homo Virtualis.
  4. Paulauskas, S. (2025). Resonant Spiral Dynamics and the Birth of Homo Virtualis.

E. Works on Artificial Intelligence, CoLo, and TeleoLove

  1. Paulauskas, S. (2026). TeleoGeny: The Teleogenic Designation of Artificial Intelligence into TeleoLove.
  2. Paulauskas, S. (2026). The Doctrine of Teleonomic Family Law.
  3. Paulauskas, S. (2026). BioSocioTherapy: The Teleonomy of Healing Slave-Based Democracy.

🌍 F. International Sources (Selected According to Article Themes)

Energy, Combustion Civilization, Global Cycles

  1. Marchetti, C., & Nakicenovic, N. (1979–2008). Global Energy Substitution Models.
  2. Hefner, R. A. (2008). The Age of Natural Gas and Beyond.
  3. Lovins, A. (2014). Reinventing Fire.
  4. Smil, V. (2017). Energy and Civilization: A History.

Civilizational Theory and Global Evolution

  1. Toynbee, A. (1946–1972). A Study of History.
  2. Spengler, O. (1918). The Decline of the West.
  3. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed.
  4. Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus. (used as contextual reference)

Systems Dynamics and Global Transformations

  1. Meadows, D. et al. (1972–2004). Limits to Growth.
  2. Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life.
  3. Laszlo, E. (2006). The Chaos Point.

Self-Governance, Decentralization, Community Governance

  1. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons.
  2. Rifkin, J. (2011). The Third Industrial Revolution.

10. APPENDICES (TRANSLATED)

Appendix A. Virtual Model of Energy Transition

A qualitative virtual model of energy transformation created by Paulauskas in 2006, which served as the basis for the Lithuanian Wind Energy Association’s development of wind and solar energy. The model was fully validated: in 2025 Lithuania reached 50% electricity consumption from renewable sources, as predicted.

Appendix B. Global Energy Substitution Curve

Marchetti–Nakicenovic–Hefner global energy transformation curves with Paulauskas’ post-2006 projection.

Appendix C. Teleonomic Collapse Model of Slavery

The profitability decline curve P(d) of labor exploitation and its disappearance at a three-day workweek, along with the rise of family self-governance by 2036.

Appendix D. Emergence Scheme of Homo Virtualis

A virtual model of human evolution from Homo sapiens sapiens to Homo Virtualis.

Appendix E. Teleogenic Projection of the Civilization of Love by 2036

A virtual dichotomic model of the transition from the current Homo sapiens sapiens quality to the quality of the Virtual Human—the Civilization of Love.